TakeV/guix
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
guix/gnu/packages/patches/protobuf-fix-build-on-32bit.patch
Maxim Cournoyer 9f6479ecad
gnu: protobuf: Update to 3.21.9. 
* gnu/packages/protobuf.scm (protobuf): Update to 3.21.9.  Move outputs field before
build system.  Move inputs field below arguments.
[source]: Apply patch and update URL.
[build-system]: Use cmake-build-system.  This causes the CMake support files
to be installed, which is expected by some packages such as hyperledger-iroha.
[arguments]: Use gexps.
[configure-flags]: Add BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.
[phases]: Add set-c++-standard.
[home-page]: Update URL.
(protobuf-3.6): Adjust to continue using the gnu-build-system.
* gnu/packages/patches/protobuf-fix-build-on-32bit.patch: New patch.
* gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register it.
2022-11-06 00:08:03 -04:00

140 lines
6.9 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From 5f4a52d9bff7595ec47fb6727662a1cada3cd404 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Kruskal <mkruskal@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:23:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] Patching static assert test failure
---
Edited to remove the patches touching the php directory.
src/google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc b/src/google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc
index 8b436bc20c..84da3c5465 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc
@@ -855,8 +855,10 @@ TEST(ExtensionSetTest, SpaceUsedExcludingSelf) {
const size_t old_capacity = \
message->GetRepeatedExtension(unittest::repeated_##type##_extension) \
.Capacity(); \
- EXPECT_GE(old_capacity, \
- (RepeatedFieldLowerClampLimit<cpptype, sizeof(void*)>())); \
+ EXPECT_GE( \
+ old_capacity, \
+ (RepeatedFieldLowerClampLimit<cpptype, std::max(sizeof(cpptype), \
+ sizeof(void*))>())); \
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) { \
message->AddExtension(unittest::repeated_##type##_extension, value); \
} \
From c94b66706bec17d918495f4715183a5eaf0f8044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Kruskal <mkruskal@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:31:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] Test fixes for 32-bit architectures
---
.../compiler/cpp/message_size_unittest.cc | 2 +-
.../protobuf/io/zero_copy_stream_unittest.cc | 3 ++
.../protobuf/repeated_field_unittest.cc | 4 +--
src/google/protobuf/util/time_util_test.cc | 28 +++++++++++--------
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/message_size_unittest.cc b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/message_size_unittest.cc
index a75d77a70c..ed4a90e223 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/message_size_unittest.cc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/message_size_unittest.cc
@@ -139,9 +139,9 @@ TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, OneStringSize) {
TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, MoreStringSize) {
struct MockGenerated : public MockMessageBase { // 16 bytes
- int has_bits[1]; // 4 bytes
int cached_size; // 4 bytes
MockRepeatedPtrField data; // 24 bytes
+ // + 4 bytes padding
};
GOOGLE_CHECK_MESSAGE_SIZE(MockGenerated, 48);
EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(protobuf_unittest::MoreString), sizeof(MockGenerated));
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/io/zero_copy_stream_unittest.cc b/src/google/protobuf/io/zero_copy_stream_unittest.cc
index d82354e571..d656da5f13 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/io/zero_copy_stream_unittest.cc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/io/zero_copy_stream_unittest.cc
@@ -720,6 +720,9 @@ TEST_F(IoTest, StringIo) {
// Verifies that outputs up to kint32max can be created.
TEST_F(IoTest, LargeOutput) {
+ // Filter out this test on 32-bit architectures.
+ if(sizeof(void*) < 8) return;
+
std::string str;
StringOutputStream output(&str);
void* unused_data;
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/repeated_field_unittest.cc b/src/google/protobuf/repeated_field_unittest.cc
index eb0b9091cf..3baf6f25bb 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/repeated_field_unittest.cc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/repeated_field_unittest.cc
@@ -429,14 +429,14 @@ TEST(RepeatedField, ReserveNothing) {
TEST(RepeatedField, ReserveLowerClamp) {
int clamped_value = internal::CalculateReserveSize<bool, sizeof(void*)>(0, 1);
- EXPECT_GE(clamped_value, 8 / sizeof(bool));
+ EXPECT_GE(clamped_value, sizeof(void*) / sizeof(bool));
EXPECT_EQ((internal::RepeatedFieldLowerClampLimit<bool, sizeof(void*)>()),
clamped_value);
// EXPECT_EQ(clamped_value, (internal::CalculateReserveSize<bool,
// sizeof(void*)>( clamped_value, 2)));
clamped_value = internal::CalculateReserveSize<int, sizeof(void*)>(0, 1);
- EXPECT_GE(clamped_value, 8 / sizeof(int));
+ EXPECT_GE(clamped_value, sizeof(void*) / sizeof(int));
EXPECT_EQ((internal::RepeatedFieldLowerClampLimit<int, sizeof(void*)>()),
clamped_value);
// EXPECT_EQ(clamped_value, (internal::CalculateReserveSize<int,
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/util/time_util_test.cc b/src/google/protobuf/util/time_util_test.cc
index 464e57b4ee..dceb6dbe2b 100644
--- a/src/google/protobuf/util/time_util_test.cc
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/util/time_util_test.cc
@@ -48,15 +48,18 @@ using google::protobuf::Timestamp;
namespace {
TEST(TimeUtilTest, TimestampStringFormat) {
- Timestamp begin, end;
- EXPECT_TRUE(TimeUtil::FromString("0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", &begin));
- EXPECT_EQ(TimeUtil::kTimestampMinSeconds, begin.seconds());
- EXPECT_EQ(0, begin.nanos());
- EXPECT_TRUE(TimeUtil::FromString("9999-12-31T23:59:59.999999999Z", &end));
- EXPECT_EQ(TimeUtil::kTimestampMaxSeconds, end.seconds());
- EXPECT_EQ(999999999, end.nanos());
- EXPECT_EQ("0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", TimeUtil::ToString(begin));
- EXPECT_EQ("9999-12-31T23:59:59.999999999Z", TimeUtil::ToString(end));
+ // These these are out of bounds for 32-bit architectures.
+ if(sizeof(time_t) >= sizeof(uint64_t)) {
+ Timestamp begin, end;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TimeUtil::FromString("0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", &begin));
+ EXPECT_EQ(TimeUtil::kTimestampMinSeconds, begin.seconds());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, begin.nanos());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(TimeUtil::FromString("9999-12-31T23:59:59.999999999Z", &end));
+ EXPECT_EQ(TimeUtil::kTimestampMaxSeconds, end.seconds());
+ EXPECT_EQ(999999999, end.nanos());
+ EXPECT_EQ("0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", TimeUtil::ToString(begin));
+ EXPECT_EQ("9999-12-31T23:59:59.999999999Z", TimeUtil::ToString(end));
+ }
// Test negative timestamps.
Timestamp time = TimeUtil::NanosecondsToTimestamp(-1);
n@@ -94,9 +97,12 @@ TEST(TimeUtilTest, DurationStringFormat) {
EXPECT_TRUE(TimeUtil::FromString("0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", &begin));
EXPECT_TRUE(TimeUtil::FromString("9999-12-31T23:59:59.999999999Z", &end));
- EXPECT_EQ("315537897599.999999999s", TimeUtil::ToString(end - begin));
+ // These these are out of bounds for 32-bit architectures.
+ if(sizeof(time_t) >= sizeof(uint64_t)) {
+ EXPECT_EQ("315537897599.999999999s", TimeUtil::ToString(end - begin));
+ EXPECT_EQ("-315537897599.999999999s", TimeUtil::ToString(begin - end));
+ }
EXPECT_EQ(999999999, (end - begin).nanos());
- EXPECT_EQ("-315537897599.999999999s", TimeUtil::ToString(begin - end));
EXPECT_EQ(-999999999, (begin - end).nanos());
// Generated output should contain 3, 6, or 9 fractional digits.
Reference in a new issue View git blame Copy permalink