From 5bd00bb54235856dddd11e9f0d03481c5469ca63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Saku Laesvuori Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 19:23:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] guix: import: Parse cabal layout blocks correctly Cabal consideres lines to be part of a layout block if they are indented at least one space more than the field line the block belongs to. Previously Guix considered lines to be a part of the block if they were indented at least as much as the first line in it. This also makes a workaround that enabled if statements to have multiple elses redundant and removes it. Fixes: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/35743 * guix/import/cabal.scm (current-indentation*): Renamed from current-indentation. (previous-indentation, current-indentation): New variables. (make-cabal-parser): Remove outdated comment. [open]: Use previous-indentation + 1 instead of current-indentation. [elif-else]: Split to elif and else to allow only one ELSE in an if statement. (read-cabal)[parameterize]: Use current-indentation* and previous-indentation. * tests/hackage.scm (hackage->guix-package test mixed layout): Expect to pass. Change-Id: I3a1495b1588a022fabbfe8dad9f3231e578af4f3 Signed-off-by: Lars-Dominik Braun --- guix/import/cabal.scm | 42 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------- tests/hackage.scm | 2 -- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/import/cabal.scm b/guix/import/cabal.scm index fe03c30254..b969197455 100644 --- a/guix/import/cabal.scm +++ b/guix/import/cabal.scm @@ -130,8 +130,17 @@ to the stack." (define (context-stack-clear!) ((context-stack) 'clear!)) -;; Indentation of the line being parsed. -(define current-indentation (make-parameter 0)) +;; Indentation of the line being parsed and that of the previous line. +(define current-indentation* (make-parameter 0)) + +(define previous-indentation (make-parameter 0)) + +(define* (current-indentation #:optional value) + (if value + (begin + (previous-indentation (current-indentation*)) + (current-indentation* value)) + (current-indentation*))) ;; Signal to reprocess the beginning of line, in case we need to close more ;; than one indentation level. @@ -196,27 +205,13 @@ to the stack." (exprs elif-else) : (append $1 (list ($2 '(())))) (elif-else) : (list ($1 '(())))) ;; LALR(1) parsers prefer to be left-recursive, which make if-statements slightly involved. - ;; XXX: This technically allows multiple else statements. - (elif-else (elif-else ELIF tests OCURLY exprs CCURLY) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list (append (list 'if $3 $5) y)))) - (elif-else ELIF tests open exprs close) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list (append (list 'if $3 $5) y)))) - (elif-else ELSE OCURLY exprs CCURLY) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list $4))) - ;; The 'open' token after 'tests' is shifted after an 'exprs' - ;; is found. This is because, instead of 'exprs' a 'OCURLY' - ;; token is a valid alternative. For this reason, 'open' - ;; pushes a with a line indentation equal to - ;; the indentation of 'exprs'. - ;; - ;; Differently from this, without the rule above this - ;; comment, when an 'ELSE' token is found, the 'open' token - ;; following the 'ELSE' would be shifted immediately, before - ;; the 'exprs' is found (because there are no other valid - ;; tokens). The 'open' would therefore create a - ;; with the indentation of 'ELSE' and not - ;; 'exprs', creating an inconsistency. We therefore allow - ;; mixed style conditionals. - (elif-else ELSE open exprs close) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list $4))) + (elif (elif ELIF tests OCURLY exprs CCURLY) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list (append (list 'if $3 $5) y)))) + (elif ELIF tests open exprs close) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list (append (list 'if $3 $5) y)))) ;; Terminating rule. (if-then) : (lambda (y) (append $1 y))) + (elif-else (elif ELSE OCURLY exprs CCURLY) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list $4))) + (elif ELSE open exprs close) : (lambda (y) ($1 (list $4))) + (elif) : $1) (if-then (IF tests OCURLY exprs CCURLY) : (list 'if $2 $4) (IF tests open exprs close) : (list 'if $2 $4)) (tests (TEST OPAREN ID CPAREN) : `(,$1 ,$3) @@ -237,7 +232,7 @@ to the stack." (OPAREN tests CPAREN) : $2) (open () : (context-stack-push! (make-parse-context (context layout) - (current-indentation)))) + (+ 1 (previous-indentation))))) (close (VCCURLY)))) (define (peek-next-line-indent port) @@ -655,7 +650,8 @@ If #f use the function 'port-filename' to obtain it." (let ((cabal-parser (make-cabal-parser))) (parameterize ((cabal-file-name (or file-name (port-filename port) "standard input")) - (current-indentation 0) + (current-indentation* 0) + (previous-indentation 0) (check-bol? #f) (context-stack (make-stack))) (cabal-parser (make-lexer port) (errorp))))) diff --git a/tests/hackage.scm b/tests/hackage.scm index 8eea818ebd..32e5f39329 100644 --- a/tests/hackage.scm +++ b/tests/hackage.scm @@ -306,8 +306,6 @@ executable cabal ghc-options: -Wall ") -;; Fails: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35743 -(test-expect-fail 1) (test-assert "hackage->guix-package test mixed layout" (eval-test-with-cabal test-cabal-mixed-layout match-ghc-foo))