TakeV/dxx-rebirth
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Invert sense of {} messages

Browse source 
Prefer to always have 'yes' for good results and 'no' for bad results.
This commit is contained in:
Kp 2015-09-19 23:04:35 +00:00
parent b626ca67e7
commit d18835bcf9
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
SConstruct
View file

@ -511,10 +511,9 @@ help:assume C++ compiler works
raise SCons.Errors.StopError("C++ compiler does not work.")
@_custom_test
def check_compiler_missing_field_initializers(self,context):
f = {'CXXFLAGS' : ['-Wmissing-field-initializers']}
text = 'struct A{int a;};'
main = 'A a{};(void)a;'
if not self.Cxx11Compile(context, text=text, main=main, msg='whether C++ compiler warns for {} initialization', testflags=f, expect_failure=True) or \
if self.Cxx11Compile(context, text=text, main=main, msg='whether C++ compiler accepts {} initialization', testflags={'CXXFLAGS' : ['-Wmissing-field-initializers']}) or \
self.Cxx11Compile(context, text=text, main=main, msg='whether C++ compiler understands -Wno-missing-field-initializers', successflags={'CXXFLAGS' : ['-Wno-missing-field-initializers']}) or \
not self.Cxx11Compile(context, text=text, main=main, msg='whether C++ compiler always errors for {} initialization', expect_failure=True):
return