TakeV/dxx-rebirth
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove obsolete compiler test

Browse source 
gcc-5 and later produce the desired result by default.  The current
minimum gcc is gcc-10.
This commit is contained in:
Kp 2022-11-11 02:03:51 +00:00
parent 1cb33638c0
commit 1110b110c2
1 changed files with 0 additions and 25 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

25
SConstruct
View file

@ -1633,31 +1633,6 @@ static void terminate_handler()
# blank insert, regardless of whether building for SDL1 or SDL2.
self._check_system_library(context, header=['%s.h' % (library_format_name % '')], main=main, lib=library_name, successflags=successflags)
@_custom_test
def check_compiler_missing_field_initializers(self,context,
_testflags_warn={'CXXFLAGS' : ['-Wmissing-field-initializers']},
_successflags_nowarn={'CXXFLAGS' : ['-Wno-missing-field-initializers']}
):
"""
Test whether the compiler warns for a statement of the form
variable={};
gcc-4.x warns for this form, but -Wno-missing-field-initializers silences it.
gcc-5 does not warn.
This form is used extensively in the code as a shorthand for resetting
variables to their default-constructed value.
"""
text = 'struct A{int a;};'
main = 'A a{};(void)a;'
Compile = self.Compile
if Compile(context, text=text, main=main, msg='whether C++ compiler accepts {} initialization', testflags=_testflags_warn) or \
Compile(context, text=text, main=main, msg='whether C++ compiler understands -Wno-missing-field-initializers', successflags=_successflags_nowarn) or \
not Compile(context, text=text, main=main, msg='whether C++ compiler always errors for {} initialization', expect_failure=True):
return
raise SCons.Errors.StopError("C++ compiler errors on {} initialization, even with -Wno-missing-field-initializers.")
@_custom_test
def check_attribute_error(self,context):
"""